Preprint
Open ASR Leaderboard: Towards Reproducible and Transparent Multilingual and Long-Form Speech Recognition Evaluation
Hugging Face and collaborators, arXiv, 2025
Read the originalRead on October 16, 2026
- What it is
- The full text of the 2025 Open ASR Leaderboard paper, which sets out the datasets, the scoring rules and how transcripts are normalized before word error rate is computed.
- How much weight it carries
- A preprint with public code and data. Several authors work for model developers, so the benchmark is open but not fully independent of the systems it ranks. It scores read and prepared speech, not dictation into a text box.
Facts taken from this source
- As of 27 March 2026, the Open ASR Leaderboard listed 86 speech recognition models, and 74 of them were open-source.
“Of the 86 models currently listed in the ASR Leaderboard (as of 27 March 2026), 74 are open-source” (Section 2.4, Current models)
- The Open ASR Leaderboard paper says that the full and latest results table can be found on Hugging Face.
“The full and latest table can be found on Hugging Face.” (Table 3 caption)
- On the Open ASR Leaderboard's English short-form tests, NVIDIA Canary 1B v2 had an average word error rate of 7.15 percent, with an RTFx of 749.
“NVIDIA Canary 1B v2 Yes 7.15 749 FastConformer” (Table 3, short-form English)
- On the same leaderboard track, NVIDIA Canary Qwen 2.5B, a speech encoder with a language-model decoder, had an average word error rate of 5.63 percent and an RTFx of 418.
“NVIDIA Canary Qwen 2.5B Yes 5.63 418 FastConformer” (Table 3)
- On the Open ASR Leaderboard's English short-form tests, Cohere Labs Transcribe had an average word error rate of 5.42 percent, and the paper's table marks it as open.
“Cohere Labs Transcribe Yes 5.42 525 FastConformer” (Table 3, short-form English)
- On the Open ASR Leaderboard's English short-form tests, Distil-Whisper Large v3.5 had an average word error rate of 7.21 percent, with an RTFx of 202.
“Distil-Whisper Large v3.5 Yes 7.21 202 Whisper” (Table 3, short-form English)
- The Open ASR Leaderboard reports two metrics: word error rate for transcription quality and inverse real-time factor for inference speed.
“We report results on two metrics: word error rate (WER) for comparing transcription quality, and inverse real-time factor (RTFx) for comparing inference speed.” (Section 2.3 Metrics)
- For the Open ASR Leaderboard's normalized transcripts, punctuation and casing are removed, along with disfluencies such as fillers, repetitions and repairs, before word error rate is computed.
“For normalized transcriptions, punctuation and casing is removed, as well as disfluencies such as fillers” (Evaluation methodology, normalized transcriptions)
- On the Open ASR Leaderboard's English short-form track, NVIDIA Parakeet TDT 0.6B v2 had an average word error rate of 6.05 percent and an inverse real-time factor of 3,390.
“NVIDIA Parakeet TDT 0.6B v2 Yes 6.05 3390 FastConformer” (Table 3)
- On the Open ASR Leaderboard's English short-form tests, NVIDIA Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 had an average word error rate of 6.32 percent, with an RTFx of 3,330.
“NVIDIA Parakeet TDT 0.6B v3 Yes 6.32 3330 FastConformer” (Table 3, short-form English)
- The authors of the Open ASR Leaderboard paper say that private evaluation sets could help minimize the risk of test-set contamination.
“private evaluation sets could help minimize the risk of test-set contamination” (Conclusion)
- On the same leaderboard track, OpenAI Whisper Large v3 had an average word error rate of 7.44 percent and an inverse real-time factor of 146.
“OpenAI Whisper Large v3 Yes 7.44 146 Whisper” (Table 3)
- On the Open ASR Leaderboard's English short-form tests, OpenAI Whisper Large v3 Turbo had an average word error rate of 7.83 percent, with an RTFx of 200.
“OpenAI Whisper Large v3 Turbo Yes 7.83 200” (Table 3, short-form English)
- On the same English short-form tests, Zoom Scribe v1 had an average word error rate of 5.47 percent, and the paper's table marks it as not open.
“Zoom Scribe v1 No 5.47 - - - 1 IBM Granite Speech 4.0 1B” (Table 3, short-form English)
- The Open ASR Leaderboard reports the inverse real-time factor (RTFx) rather than the real-time factor.
“We report the inverse real-time factor, rather than real-time factor” (Section 2.3, Metrics)
Pages that rest on this source
- Open-Source Speech Recognition: The Best ModelsGuide
- What is the Open ASR Leaderboard?Question
- Speech Recognition: What It Is and How Well It WorksTopic
- What Is Whisper AI? OpenAI's Speech Model ExplainedGuide
- Word Error Rate (WER): How to Calculate and Read ItGuide
- Speech to Text and LLMs: What Language Models ChangeGuide
- Speech Recognition Models: How Neural ASR WorksGuide
- Speech Recognition Benchmarks and LeaderboardsGuide
- Offline Speech to Text on Windows: What WorksGuide
- Can large language models do speech recognition?Question
- What are the best alternatives to Whisper?Question
- What is the most accurate speech-to-text model?Question
- Which speech-to-text API is the best?Question
- Human vs AI Transcription: Accuracy, Cost, SpeedGuide
- Meeting Transcription: How It Works and What to UseGuide
- Speech-to-Text APIs Compared: Price, Accuracy, SpeedGuide
- How Accurate Is Speech Recognition? The Real NumbersGuide
- How do you learn speech recognition?Question
- What is the most accurate dictation software?Question
- Why do speech-to-text accuracy claims disagree?Question
- Filler wordsGlossary
- Word error rate (WER)Glossary
- Real-Time Speech Recognition: Streaming and LatencyGuide
- On-Device vs Cloud Speech Recognition: The TradeoffsGuide