Fact · Dictation for work and study
3.45percent omission rate
In the same npj Digital Medicine study, LLM-generated clinical notes had an omission rate of 3.45 percent, meaning clinically relevant content from the visit was left out.
Checked against its source on October 16, 2026
In the source's own words
“We observed a 1.47% hallucination rate and a 3.45% omission rate.”
A framework to assess clinical safety and hallucination rates of LLMs for medical text summarisation, Asgari E et al., npj Digital Medicine, 2025, Abstract.
Open the original (DOI 10.1038/s41746-025-01670-7)- What it measures
- The same 18 configurations and 12,999 annotated sentences as the hallucination rate. The authors used the omission category in their error taxonomy.
- What it does not show
- The rate depends on the authors' taxonomy and on prompts and workflows they refined. The authors' company sells the system, and the paper declares no competing interests.
Source
Cited on
- AI Medical Scribes and Ambient Clinical DocumentationGuide
- Human vs AI Transcription: Accuracy, Cost, SpeedGuide
- AI Voice Notes: From Rambling to Summaries and To-DosGuide
- Are AI summaries of voice recordings accurate?Question
- How do you turn a meeting transcript into minutes?Question
- What is the difference between a meeting transcript and meeting minutes?Question