Skip to content

Fact · Speech recognition

Many state-of-the-art inverse text normalization systems use hand-written weighted finite-state transducer grammars, because the task has extremely low tolerance to unrecoverable errors.

Checked against its source on October 17, 2026

In the source's own words

“Many state-of-the-art ITN systems use hand-written weighted finite-state transducer(WFST) grammars since this task has extremely low tolerance to unrecoverable errors.”

NeMo Inverse Text Normalization: From Development To Production, Yang Zhang et al., arXiv, 2021, Abstract.

Open the original (DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2104.05055)
What it measures
The sentence explains why rule-based grammars remained common in ITN even as neural models spread through speech recognition.
What it does not show
Describes the state of the art in 2021. Neural ITN models have since been proposed, and the paper's own hybrid design adds a neural model to the grammar approach.

Source

Cited on

Why ITN systems are often hand-written grammars | Yap