Skip to content

Fact · Dictation for work and study

In the UCLA randomized trial of two AI scribes, physicians rated clinically significant inaccuracies as occurring occasionally, for both products, on a five-point scale.

Checked against its source on October 16, 2026

In the source's own words

“clinically significant inaccuracies were noted "occasionally" on five-point Likert questions”

Ambient AI Scribes in Clinical Practice: A Randomized Trial, Lukac PJ et al., NEJM AI, 2025, Results.

Open the original (DOI 10.1056/aioa2501000)
What it measures
The UCLA trial used a five-point Likert question for inaccuracies in each product's notes. The word occasionally is the scale label that the abstract uses.
What it does not show
A rating by the users of the scribes, not an audit against recordings. The abstract gives no per-product rate of errors, so it is not a count of error frequency.

Source

Clinically significant inaccuracies rated as occasional | Yap