Fact · Dictation
94studies
Fox, Ericsson and Best's meta-analysis covered 94 studies that compared performance during concurrent verbalization with a silent condition.
Checked against its source on October 16, 2026
In the source's own words
“a meta-analysis of 94 studies comparing performance while giving concurrent verbalizations to a matching condition”
Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods, Mark C. Fox et al., Psychological Bulletin, 2011, Abstract.
Open the original (DOI 10.1037/a0021663)- What it measures
- Each study contributed a comparison between a verbalizing condition and a matching silent condition.
- What it does not show
- Studies with different tasks and instructions, pooled into one estimate.