Fact · Voice privacy and security
ABA Formal Opinion 512 concludes that informed consent is required before client information is entered into self-learning generative AI tools whose outputs could disclose it.
Checked against its source on October 16, 2026
In the source's own words
“For those tools, the opinion concludes, “informed consent is required” before entering client information.”
AI, Confidentiality, and the Stratified Legal Profession, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology (JOLT Digest), 2026, Discussion of Opinion 512.
Open the original- What it measures
- The same commentary notes the opinion does not require consent when no client information is entered.
- What it does not show
- A commentary on the opinion rather than the opinion text; it also stresses the opinion is tied to tools as of July 2024.
Source
Cited on
- Speech to Text Privacy: Where Your Voice GoesTopic
- Is Voice to Text Safe? How to Dictate PrivatelyGuide
- Legal Dictation Software for Lawyers and Law FirmsGuide
- Legal Transcription: The Job, Formats and PayGuide
- Is Apple Dictation Private? What Apple KeepsGuide
- Dictation for Lawyers: Privilege and ConfidentialityGuide
- Does using cloud dictation waive attorney-client privilege?Question
- Is legal transcription still in demand?Question
- What does ABA Formal Opinion 512 say about AI tools?Question
- What is legal transcription?Question
- Which legal transcription companies hire transcriptionists?Question